Category: Climate Change

11/28/14

  10:15:00 am, by Jim Jenal - Founder & CEO   , 420 words  
Categories: All About Solar Power, Climate Change, Ranting

Who's Fueling Whom? WSPA's Covert Campaign Against Cap and Trade

“Cap and Trade” - a sensible approach to addressing climate change by reducing emissions of Greenhouse Gasses - was once considered so non-controversial that even prominent Republicans like John McCain and even Newt Gingrich endorsed it.  Today the idea is routinely trashed in Washington as a “big government energy mandate“  that must be stopped at all costs.  And yet, in California, Cap and Trade has been up and running for nearly two years despite legal challenges and dire predictions that it would ruin the economy. (Hint: it hasn’t!)

Now the program (known as AB32) is set to expand to cover vehicle fuels, which account for one-third of all GHG emissions in the state, and industry, particularly the fossil-fuel industry, is attacking the program again.  Only this time they are playing a smarter, some would say more cynical, game - hiding behind “AstroTurf” groups to conceal their agenda. 

Perhaps you’ve seen this ad:

 WSPA astroturfing adHeavens, Californians are facing a “hidden” gas tax - oh no! - and who is giving you this news?  An attractive model fronting for something called the “California Drivers Alliance” who wants you to sign their petition.  In reality, what is hidden here is who is actually behind this ad - the Western States Petroleum Association (WSPA) and its fossil-fuel producing members.

In a PowerPoint presentation highlighting WSPA’s “Priority Issues” under the banner, “Energy Proud”, WSPA lays out how the current boost in domestic crude oil production should be “The Best of Times” except for those pesky concerns over the environment from fracking, oil spills, and yes, GHG emissions which threatens WSPA’s members with “The Worst of Times.”   Their response?  A massive astroturfing campaign designed to mislead consumers over the impact of this next phase of California’s cap and trade program all the while keeping the role of Big Oil out of the picture.

WSPA astroturfing

Fortunately WSPA has not been as sly as they intended, with their game plan having been made public, and now facing a coalition of pro-environment groups helping to unmask the powers behind the astroturfing. That coalition, operating under the name, Stop Fooling CA, is putting out the facts behind WSPA’s campaign to deceive the public, including clever graphics like the cartoon on the right.  On their website you can sign up for news alerts and add your name to the list of people who are pushing back against Big Oil’s covert attempt to derail the most successful cap and trade program anywhere in the world, and one that even the Wall Street Journal concedes, “may hold lessons for other states.”

11/12/14

  08:05:00 am, by Jim Jenal - Founder & CEO   , 235 words  
Categories: Climate Change

US & China Agree on GHG Reductions - UPDATE

In a dramatic joint announcement coming out of the APEC summit in China, President Barack Obama and Chinese President Xi Jinping have committed to significant reductions in greenhouse gas emissions. (H/T climatecrocks.com)

The agreement calls on China to peak its GHG emissions by no later than 2030 and increase the use of non-fossil fuels to 20% by that date.  Meanwhile, the US will cut its GHG emissions by 26-28% (compared to 2005 levels) by 2025.  For the two largest emitters of GHG, these steps by the US and China are historic and much needed.

“As the world’s two largest economies, energy consumers and emitters of greenhouse gases, we have a special responsibility to lead the global effort against climate change,” Obama said Wednesday in a joint press conference with Xi.

UPDATE - We noted that this was a really big deal, but the graph below is truly the picture worth a thousand words:

Significance of US-China carbon deal

While the impact of the actions from the US and China alone are significant, as the graph shows, their greatest benefit is in serving as an example for other countries to follow.

Beyond the practical significance in helping to combat climate change, China’s commitment - coming as it does from the head of the Communist Party - takes away the deniers’ favorite argument: that it is meaningless for the US to act since China never will.  Well guess what, China is acting.

Sorry deniers, what else have you got?

10/13/14

  08:00:00 am, by Jim Jenal - Founder & CEO   , 172 words  
Categories: Climate Change

2014 - Warmest Year Ever?

The folks over at NASA are reporting something that folks out here in the West will not find at all surprising: 2014 is on track to contend for the title of warmest year ever.  (No doubt this will come as a shock to folks who regularly watch Fox News.)  (H/T Climate Crocks.)

Warmest year ever?

The chart shows the temperature anomaly for 134 years with the zoom in on the five warmest. 2014 is the heavy grey line; 2010 (the hottest year on record) is in red.  (Oh, and contrary to the Fox canard about a global cooling trend, in fact of the five warmest years ever, two were in the past five - 2010 and 2013.)

Of course, 2014 isn’t over yet so the dotted lines provide a number of possible scenarios.  To give you a sense of how far “ahead” we are so far this year, if the remaining months simply hit their 21st century averages, 2014 will tie 2005 for the second warmest year ever.

Hang on to this link, you may need to refer to it next month over Thanksgiving dinner!

07/20/14

  07:14:00 am, by Jim Jenal - Founder & CEO   , 259 words  
Categories: Climate Change, Ranting

What has been done, can be done...

How did we get from this…

LA Smog circa 1968

LA Smog circa 1968

To this…

On a clear day you can see forever...

On a clear day…

In my lifetime?

As a school child growing up in a suburb of Los Angeles, I was all too familiar with the upper scene: ground level ozone and other pollutants that literally made it hurt to breathe.  Kids would come into classrooms after lunchtime recess and cough for half an hour.  Every day.  The very air was killing us and no one seemed to have the ability, or the will, to change it.

The story of how LA drastically improved its air quality has much to teach us as we face the fight to do something about climate change.  The tactics of those who profit from the status quo are exactly the same: denial, obfuscation, entrenched resistance.  But we overcame their resistance before, and what has been done can be done.  The question is: do we have the will?

Which brings me to the wonderful series on addressing these issues that ran this past week on Kai Ryssdal’s always engaging Marketplace on NPR.  (Sidenote: we listen to NPR on KPCC, and we have a Solar Member’s Benefit for KPCC members!

In a week-long series titled, We Used to be China, the Marketplace Sustainability crew looks at how, not so long ago, the US faced pollution issues every bit as daunting as what confronts China today, and more broadly, the globe.  In particular, the sections on LA’s Smog and on the Cap and Trade program that cured Acid Rain are particularly illuminating.  Check them out.

04/23/14

  11:04:00 am, by Jim Jenal - Founder & CEO   , 583 words  
Categories: Climate Change, Ranting

"The New Abolitionism" - What is needed to save our skins

Folks often write about Climate Change in terms of saving the Earth, but that isn’t accurate.  Solving the problem of Climate Change is about saving us, saving our skins, and a brilliant new piece over at The Nation spells out quite clearly what that will take: “The New Abolitionism.”

Now I realize that we just posted a piece yesterday featuring Chris Hayes and following it up with a summary of his lengthy article may seem a tad too fanboy for some, but there are two good reasons for these back-to-back posts:
1) Chris Hayes writes more intelligently about the subject than just about anyone, and 2) the issue is just too important to ignore.  So here we go.

Fossil fuelsAs you might gather from the title, Hayes draws a parallel to the steps necessary to solve Climate Change to the ending of slavery in America.  But his point isn’t to equate the fossil fuel industry with the moral atrocity of slave holding.  Rather, his point is about the economic impact of both ending slavery and ending our dependence on fossil fuels, and the audacity of the demand from both the Abolitionists before the Civil War and Climate Change activists today.

Hayes lays out the economic history of slavery and notes that prior to the Civil War, the value of the slave economy in the South was something like $10 trillion (with a T) dollars.  And the Abolitionists were demanding that those who owned slaves - who owned that economic gold mine - give it all up without compensation.  Which they were forced to do, but only after we fought the bloodiest war in our history.

What has that to do with the fossil fuel industry?  Turns out that in a 2012 paper titled “Global Warming’s Terrifying New Math,” Bill McKibben laid out the calculation for how much carbon we could emit into the atmosphere and still avoid the 2°C temperature increase that most scientists believe is the level beyond which we dare not go, at least not if we are going to save our skins.  According to McKibben, that total is 565 gigatons of carbon - which seems like a staggeringly high number, until you learn this: according to the Carbon Tracker Initiative, the proven reserves of the world’s fossil fuels is 2,795 gigatons.  In other words, “the total amount of known, proven extractable fossil fuel in the ground at this very moment is almost five times the amount we can safely burn." 

Uh-oh. 

Here’s how McKibben phrased it, writing back in 2012:

Think of two degrees Celsius as the legal drinking limit – equivalent to the 0.08 blood-alcohol level below which you might get away with driving home. The 565 gigatons is how many drinks you could have and still stay below that limit – the six beers, say, you might consume in an evening. And the 2,795 gigatons? That’s the three 12-packs the fossil-fuel industry has on the table, already opened and ready to pour.

How much are all of those reserves worth?  Hard to say precisely since energy prices are highly volatile, but according to Hayes, a fair estimate is somewhere north of $10 trillion (again, with a T).  That is an awful lot of money to leave on the table, and those of us who are asking to rein in the fossil fuel industry need to understand that those are the kinds of dollars we are talking about.

Hayes takes that comparison and manages to end on an upbeat note, so you owe it to yourself to check out the entire article, The New Abolitionism, here.

<< 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 >>

Jim Jenal is the Founder & CEO of Run on Sun, Pasadena's premier installer and integrator of top-of-the-line solar power installations.
Laurel Hamilton is Run on Sun's Projects Coordinator, and together they author this blog.
Run on Sun also offers solar consulting services, working with consumers, utilities, and municipalities to help them make solar power affordable and reliable.

Ready to Save?

Let’s Get Started!

Give Us a Call!

626.793.6025 or
310.584.7755

Click to Learn More About Commercial Solar Power!

We're Social!



Follow Run on Sun on Twitter Like Run on Sun on Facebook

Search

Run on Sun helps fight Climate Change
multiblog platform